Well, it's been a while for a Boilerplate Blurb, but here is one that cuts to the chase (pun intended). The severability (aka savings) clause is used to keep a contract and its various provisions intact if parts of it are deemed illegal or unenforceable in a court. Why? With written agreements being so long today, and business deals operating as ongoing transactions it is clear that sometimes something once was legal when first drafted may become illegal or unenforceable as time goes on. However, is that one reason to throw out the whole contract? Probably not. Therefore, a severability clause will be used to save parts of the agreement even if other provisions are rendered inoperable, and they read something like this:
If any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid by a court of proper jurisdiction, the provision is affected only to the extent of the invalidity, so that the remainder of that provision and all remaining provisions of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect.
However, sometimes some parts of a contract are so essential the purpose of the contract that if they are voided the severability clause states that the whole contract should be voided. Finally, it should be noted in many legal jurisdictions, such a clause shall not be applied if it fundamentally alters the contract.
Since it is legislative season here in Hawaii, you should also know that when drafting legislation we attorneys like to use a severability clauses to save laws should the be deemed unconstitutional. This represents another facet of the interplay between the judicial and legislative branches.
*Disclaimer: This post discusses general legal issues, but does not constitute legal advice in any respect. No reader should act or refrain from acting based on information contained herein without seeking the advice of counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Ryan K. Hew, Attorney At Law, LLLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to any actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this post.